more evidence

In dispatches from the “more evidence I’m the husband in our imaginary, gender-normative, internet relationship” front: I can’t substantiate my claim that the former iteration of this blog (what’s the rumpus) existed by the fall of 2003. Having gone through my (poorly imported) archives here, and using the Internet Wayback machine, the oldest post I can find is from December 26th, 2004. But as early as August, 2007, I noted this post was the “oldest remaining” which I know means I was sure older posts were made.

So, I’m the husband that can’t remember my blog’s anniversary.

I need a ruling: do I stick with my human memory, that WITW (nee Rumpus), was created on or around December 1, 2003, or do I stick with the digital record? WHEN HAZ CAKE?

 

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

this is THE

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

new gawk

The best idea I’ve read in a while is this suggestion for a mega-McDonalds in Times Square.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

everyday i’m…

It is my sworn duty to tell you:

[1] The results of the annual Village Voice Pazz and Jop awards are out and no surprises…Frank Ocean tops the best albums category while Carly Rae Jepsen won most popular single. As usual, there are a few nice round-up articles–please take time especially to read Sundermann’s piece on Ocean (if only because it is likely to be read and discussed by others) and Jessica Hopper’s piece on girls in ’12 pop, because it rightly identifies the on-going Problems of Gender in music.

[2] Blogger-administrator-producer-consultant-pundit* Howard Sherman makes a call for national arts radio, in a perhaps unintentional slight of Fresh Air, Soundcheck, and–let’s be honest–most NPR radio. Perhaps the slight is unintentional because implicit in Sherman’s argument is the notion that what counts as the arts is only “Arts,” as in, the arts-as-most-60+-people-would-have-them. A more reasonable future for the arts on radio is the one NPR surges toward, with its genre-defying, non-brow-measuring interest in pop music and the Guggenheim, and everything between the two.

[3] Boy bander-solo R&B artist-actor-celebrity-restauranteur Justin Timberlake has released a song from his much-anticipated 2013 release, “The 20/20 Experience.” He’s written a “letter” (a blog post, IMHO) to you in which he describes the album as an act of serendipity:

I just went into the studio and started playing around with some sounds and songs. It was probably the best time I’ve had in my career… Just creating with no rules and/or end goal in mind and really enjoying the process.

I’m allergic to this sort of justification, even if I recognize this creative process does exist (“let’s throw it at the wall and see what sticks”) and is often fruitful, I think mostly because it is so self-satisfied while diminishing craft…it is a quintessential humblebrag. Made possible by the mountains of money he sits upon. That we gave him. Which he doesn’t mention.

The wonderful Ann Powers wrote about the single, “Suit and Tie” (which you can listen to on the letter page, linked above), describing it as one in a group of “superstar singles:”

Their pleasures sneak up, in a wash of harmonies, a masterful sense of how a song can be a soliloquy, or in Timberlake’s case, almost entirely in the vocal, which dances around Timbaland’s horn thrusts and rhythm parries with panache that makes me long for an isolated vocal track. These songs are not plays for power; they’re signs of privilege. Some listeners may feel they’re lazy, but heard another way, they’re relaxed — a state no one embraces very easily these days.

And she may be right. But I think I’m more in the camp of critics who don’t love the single (Powers again):

Many critics judged it quickly as a disappointment, a throwback to older R&B formulas (and to work by Timberlake’s rivals R. Kelly and Robin Thicke) that won’t set the club or the charts on fire. Similar responses have greeted other long-awaited singles: David Bowie‘s Berlin ballad “Where Are We Now?” and the Pharrell Williams-produced “Nuclear” by Destiny’s Child, the girl group that launched Beyonce’s career.

[By the way--and very importantly--don't listen to "Nuclear."]

I’m with those critics who judge “Suit & Tie” as a disappointment in the following respect: it is too Bruno Mars for 2013. I’m disappointed with the song not because it is too retro for the moment (which it isn’t–the song will sell well and so will remixes) but because it is too backward looking for Timberlake. I don’t know if you can remember the moment when you first heard “Cry Me A River” (in 2002) or “SexyBack” (in 2006) but I remember both because they shocked my ears. They were on the forward edge. Propulsive. Interesting. Sexy. This is not. It admittedly bears a strong resemblance to Robin Thicke’s blue eyed R&B–the vocal similarities are striking–but the song is somehow missing that je ne sais quoi that makes certain men sexy in suits, but not most.

 

*This hyphenated job title (his self-identification, I might add) is a completist guide to Jobs I Did Not Understand Until My 20s.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

MLK Jr. would have loved me Day

Each year, in honor of one of our country’s bravest, most eloquent, educated, wise, and complicated leaders, a bunch of idiots capitalize on any tenuous connection they might make between their commercial interests and his “legacy.” Witness two I’ve discovered today, and keep in mind the holiday’s not until week-after-next:

1. Larry Ward, chairman of the national “Gun Appreciation Day” planned to take place the weekend of Obama’s inauguration, on CNN:

“I think Martin Luther King, Jr. would agree with me if he were alive today that if African Americans had been given the right to keep and bear arms from day one of the country’s founding, perhaps slavery might not have been a chapter in our history,” Ward said.

2. “I had a dream…that someday our people would celebrate racial and economic justice in the VIP Lounge.”

MLKparty

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

benchmark

Today, Andrew Sullivan linked to my Freakonomics interview on the Daily Beast.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

holidaze

You haven’t lived until you’ve had my* apple crisp.

Here you go:

Use a combination of two kinds of apples (choose fuji and winesap if you can; avoid red delicious at all costs–they’re too soft and produce too much liquid). Cut the apples into slices. There are “slice philosophies:” some people leave the skin on, some off; some like the pieces large and some prefer small pieces that bake into something closer to sauce; I like skin off, and a combination of big and small pieces. Anyway, cut to suit your taste. You need enough apples to fill 9″ deep dish pie pan (or similar square baking dish). That’s about 6 apples; more if you have small ones, like farmer’s apples.
Toss the apples with juice from 3/4 lemon. Then toss lemon apples with:

  • 1/2 cup packed brown sugar
  • 1 Tb flour
  • 1 tsp cinnamon

In a separate bowl, combine:

  • 1 cup old fashioned oats
  • 3/4 cup white sugar
  • 3/4 cup flour
  • 1/4 tsp salt
  • 3/4 tsp cinnamon
  • pinch cloves (really–don’t overlook this)
  • 1/4 tsp baking powder

Add and rub together (to the oats mixture):
6 Tbsp cold unsalted butter, cut into chunks

Top apples with the oats/crumble mixture. (It’s a lot of crumble–add to suit your taste.)

Then top with 2 Tbsp melted butter.

Bake at 350 for 30-35 minutes. Then increase the temperature to 400 and bake another 15-25 minutes, or until top is golden and liquid begins to caramelize around the edges.

Then eat like a king.

*Okay, I owe the recipe to my friend Erin, and the inspiration for the post to my new friend Matt. But you should read yourself some Barthes if you’re hung up on this credit issue.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized